akhtar
ms

Your robots.txt file looks good to me, even though Allow isn't defined in the standard. However, major crawlers should know this directive. See (from http://tools.seochat...

akhtar

Here it is: http://kheerasteelworks.com/robots.txt

Join the forum to unlock true power of SEO community

You're welcome to become part of SEO Forum community. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Log In Sign up
ms

Are you using any traffic generation services? If your traffic is auto generated by bots (high bounce rate, low time spent on site, zero interactions, etc.) there is not...

ms

Post your robots.txt and exact URLs you're getting errors for in your Search Console. Can't really tell without knowing your robots file.

martinsveter

So, how about now? Do you have any stats? Would be interesting to see how it affected your site rankings, but my guess is, that few hours outage doesn't have too much imp...

martinsveter

It's keyword stuffing - make sure to get rid of that shit. @Sophia - nice forums ;)

nmiller

I don't see any changes yet. The numbers are about the same, including CTR. Maybe it needs some more time.

Sophia

That will surely get penalized as it is nothing but keyword stuffing one time in the url is enough and using it more than once doesnt have any extra effect

ms

There is no point to implement such a redundant URL structure. It's over-optimization, and it could be bad for your site, even though this isn't ordinary keyword stuffing...