Re: correct canonical tag?
Yes @stefanDaktari, As you mentioned above and remain assured, it will not be a trouble for SEO.
Re: correct canonical tag?
Like I did mention above? And I should accept the trouble with the SEO?
If we talk about SEO then there are many ranking factors defined by google. first, We should check our website UI and then we should go for on-page seo. In On-page SEO, w...
Re: Why my site is not ranking?
Firstly check, if website and your targeted pages Url are indexed and cached in Google. Then have a look of google search console if it is notifying any serious site hea...
Re: correct canonical tag?
The Problem is, that the same site should be available with the prices for 2022 and also for 2023. One time it is called with "Prices 2022" and the other time w...
Re: correct canonical tag?
Yes, it is problematic to SEO in the current scenario. The best way of fixing it is through the developer. Just ask your developer to fetch current year and pass prices a...
Re: correct canonical tag?
link rel="canonical" href="https://www.wipfelglueck.de/Baumhaus.php" /
Re: Redirect or canonical?
Well, I think one redirect is fine, while 2+ could be harmful. Anyway, I'd make sure that the new content is not being published on the old style URL, redirect all existi...
Re: correct canonical tag?
I did it with `` But if I have my site checked then it is obviously not so optimal for the search engines. The reason is "Internal Canonical Link". What does th...
Re: correct canonical tag?
Just set the canonical URL to the given URL without parameters. https://www.wipfelglueck.de/Baumhaus.php