juniorseo

Redirect or canonical?

by @juniorseo (68), 1 year ago

I have 1000+ duplicate pages, e.g., www.mydomain.com/category/subcategory/page-example and www.mydomain.com/page-example. What would be better to set canonical or do 301 redirect? I'm not sure if too many canonicalized pages will not seem strange to Google. Let me know the best approach, please.

674 Views
0 Upvotes
4 Replies
4 Users
Sort replies:
binayjha
by @binayjha (4749), 1 year ago

Declaring the duplicate pages canonical will be regarded as the best. Too many redirects are harmful to the SEO.

shwetakaushik
by @shwetakaushik (155), 1 year ago

In the case of described issue it will be good practice to declare canonical tag. Avoid 301 redirect because it may put unnecessary load on the server and reduce speed. Try to reduce direct redirects by using rules. Canonical tags use simple and consistent syntax, and are placed within the section of a web page:

For Example

ms
by @ms (3875), 1 year ago

Well, I think one redirect is fine, while 2+ could be harmful.

Anyway, I'd make sure that the new content is not being published on the old style URL, redirect all existing ones (already indexed) and from now on, only have one piece of content accessible on single URL.

301 redirect doesn't have to be resource expensive, as you can redirect visitor on webserver level.

joycedaniels
by @joycedaniels (-25), 1 year ago

Yes, creating canonical is advised because doing too many redirects might harm your SEO and potentially lower the domain authority (DA) of your website.

Join the forum to unlock true power of SEO community

You're welcome to become part of SEO Forum community. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Log In Sign up