Choosing between Option 1 and Option 2 for structuring Leads.com involves a trade-off between direct revenue focus and educational clarity. Opting for product pages as pillar pages (Option 1) aligns with immediate revenue goals but risks a disjointed customer journey. Educating users in a dedicated Learning Hub (Option 2) enhances content organization but may sideline the authority of product pages.

Option 1 centers on driving revenue directly from product pages, appealing to visitors familiar with Leads.com's offerings. However, the potential for a confusing customer journey and targeting an audience not in the buying phase are notable drawbacks.

Conversely, Option 2 prioritizes educational content in a Learning Hub, providing clarity and structure. Yet, it risks diminishing the authority of the main product page. A hybrid approach, balancing educational and product-focused content, or A/B testing, may offer a solution.

Ultimately, the decision hinges on Leads.com's priorities, user behavior, and SEO considerations. Gathering user feedback and testing different structures will guide the evolution of an effective website architecture.

Despite addressing technical issues, consider monitoring for potential algorithm updates, assessing competitors' strategies, and ensuring content relevance. Collaborate with the SEO team to refine the strategy and keyword targeting for improved visibility.

Several factors can affect website crawling, including poor site structure, slow page speed, and incorrect robots.txt settings. Analyze these elements